model: is bad role models

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents example
Weight: 0.65
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings honda civic
Weight: 0.66
, bmw
Weight: 0.64
, theory
Weight: 0.63
, platform
Weight: 0.62
, hybrid
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad role models 1.00
is good role models 0.99
be good role models 0.99
differ from past models 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(model, is bad role models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(model, is bad role models)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(model, is bad role models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(model, be good role models)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(model, is bad role models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(model, is good role models)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(model, is bad role models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(model, differ from past models)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(model, is bad role models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(model, be good role models)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(model, is bad role models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(model, is good role models)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(model, is bad role models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(model, differ from past models)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(model, is bad role models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(model, differ from past models)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(model, is bad role models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(model, is good role models)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(model, is bad role models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(model, be good role models)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(model, is bad role models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(model, is good role models)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(model, is bad role models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(model, be good role models)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(model, is bad role models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(model, differ from past models)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(model, is bad role models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(model, is bad role models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(model, is bad role models)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(model, is bad role models) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(model, is bad role models)