model: is useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents example
Weight: 0.65
, solution
Weight: 0.64
, approach
Weight: 0.63
, person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings honda civic
Weight: 0.66
, bmw
Weight: 0.64
, theory
Weight: 0.63
, platform
Weight: 0.62
, hybrid
Weight: 0.60

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful 1.00
be useful 0.99
is helpful 0.90
be useful for study 0.86
be useful understanding 0.84
be useful for study of system 0.83
be useful studying 0.81
be helpful to study 0.80
be useful to scientists 0.79
be helpful studying 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(approach, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(model, is useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(approach, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(approach, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(theory, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(approach, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(model, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(theory, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(theory, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(model, is useful)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(model, be useful)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(model, be useful)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(model, is helpful)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(model, be useful)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(model, is helpful)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(model, be useful)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(model, be useful for study)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(model, be useful for study)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(model, be useful for study of system)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(model, be useful for study of system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(model, be useful to scientists)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(model, be useful to scientists)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(model, be useful for study)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(model, is helpful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(model, be useful for study of system)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(model, be useful for study)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(model, be useful to scientists)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(model, be useful for study of system)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(model, is helpful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(model, be useful to scientists)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(model, is useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(model, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(approach, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(theory, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(model, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(approach, is useful)