modem: be important for net connection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.70
, network device
Weight: 0.70
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, equipment
Weight: 0.63
, peripheral
Weight: 0.61
Siblings router
Weight: 0.38
, computer network
Weight: 0.38
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, antenna
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important for net connection 1.00
be important for connection 0.89
lose connection 0.83
lose internet connection 0.81
affect internet connection speed 0.81
be charged via connection 0.80
be charged via wireless connection 0.80
losing internet connection 0.80
drops internet connection 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(device, be charged via wireless connection)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(modem, be important for net connection)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(device, be charged via wireless connection)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(device, be charged via wireless connection)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(router, lose internet connection)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(router, losing internet connection)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(router, affect internet connection speed)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(device, be charged via wireless connection)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(modem, be important for net connection)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(router, affect internet connection speed)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(router, affect internet connection speed)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(router, lose internet connection)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(router, lose internet connection)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(router, losing internet connection)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(router, losing internet connection)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(modem, be important for net connection)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(modem, be important for connection)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(modem, be important for connection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(modem, be important for connection)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(modem, lose connection)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(modem, lose connection)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(modem, drops internet connection)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(modem, lose connection)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(modem, drops internet connection)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(modem, drops internet connection)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(modem, lose connection)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(modem, be important for connection)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(modem, drops internet connection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(modem, be important for net connection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(modem, be important for net connection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(device, be charged via wireless connection)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(router, affect internet connection speed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(router, lose internet connection)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(router, losing internet connection)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(modem, be important for net connection)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(device, be charged via wireless connection)