modem: be needed for telephone communications

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.70
, network device
Weight: 0.70
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, equipment
Weight: 0.63
, peripheral
Weight: 0.61
Siblings router
Weight: 0.38
, computer network
Weight: 0.38
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, antenna
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be needed for telephone communications 1.00
be used in communication 0.84
be needed for cell phone transmission 0.83
be used in data communication system 0.78
improve communication 0.77
improve communication for individual 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(antenna, be needed for cell phone transmission)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(antenna, be used in communication)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(computer network, improve communication for individual)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(computer network, improve communication)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(antenna, be used in communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(antenna, be used in communication)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(antenna, be needed for cell phone transmission) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(antenna, be needed for cell phone transmission)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(computer network, improve communication) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(computer network, improve communication)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(computer network, improve communication for individual) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(computer network, improve communication for individual)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(modem, be needed for telephone communications)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(modem, be used in data communication system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(modem, be used in data communication system)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(modem, be used in data communication system)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(modem, be used in data communication system)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(modem, be needed for telephone communications)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(modem, be needed for telephone communications)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(antenna, be used in communication)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(antenna, be needed for cell phone transmission)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(computer network, improve communication)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(modem, be needed for telephone communications) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(computer network, improve communication for individual)