modem: going offline

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.70
, network device
Weight: 0.70
, electronic device
Weight: 0.66
, equipment
Weight: 0.63
, peripheral
Weight: 0.61
Siblings router
Weight: 0.38
, computer network
Weight: 0.38
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.37
, computer keyboard
Weight: 0.36
, antenna
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
going offline 1.00
go offline 0.97
is offline 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(device, is offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(modem, going offline)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(device, is offline)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(device, is offline)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(router, go offline)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(device, is offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(modem, going offline)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(router, go offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(router, go offline)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(modem, going offline)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(modem, is offline)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(modem, go offline)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(modem, go offline)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(modem, is offline)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(modem, go offline)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(modem, go offline)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(modem, is offline)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(modem, is offline)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(modem, going offline)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(modem, going offline)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(device, is offline)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(router, go offline)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(modem, going offline) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(device, is offline)