module: be difficult to unit test

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents electronic device
Weight: 0.68
, circuit
Weight: 0.61
, computer program
Weight: 0.59
, solution
Weight: 0.59
Siblings software
Weight: 0.67
, hardware
Weight: 0.59
, multiplier
Weight: 0.53
, classifier
Weight: 0.51
, lua
Weight: 0.43

Related properties

Property Similarity
be difficult to unit test 1.00
be hard to test 0.87
is test 0.84
is difficult 0.81
is testing 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(module, be difficult to unit test) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(software, is testing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(module, be difficult to unit test) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(software, is testing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(software, is testing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(module, be difficult to unit test) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(module, be difficult to unit test)

Similarity expansion

0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(module, be difficult to unit test) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(module, be hard to test)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(module, be difficult to unit test) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(module, be hard to test)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(module, be difficult to unit test) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(module, be hard to test)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(module, be difficult to unit test) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(module, be hard to test)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(module, be difficult to unit test) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(module, be difficult to unit test) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(module, be difficult to unit test)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(module, be difficult to unit test) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(module, be difficult to unit test)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(module, be difficult to unit test) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(software, is testing)