mollusk: affect humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.64
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.60
, organism
Weight: 0.57
, fossil
Weight: 0.50
Siblings octopus
Weight: 0.67
, snail
Weight: 0.64
, mussel
Weight: 0.61
, cephalopod
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect humans 1.00
be important to humans 0.92

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, be important to humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mollusk, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(cephalopod, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cephalopod, be important to humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mollusk, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(mollusk, affect humans)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(mollusk, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, be important to humans)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(mollusk, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(mollusk, be important to humans)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mollusk, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mollusk, be important to humans)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(mollusk, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(mollusk, be important to humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(mollusk, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(mollusk, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, affect humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(mollusk, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(mollusk, affect humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cephalopod, be important to humans)