mollusk: be considered evolved invertebrates

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.64
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.60
, organism
Weight: 0.57
, fossil
Weight: 0.50
Siblings octopus
Weight: 0.67
, snail
Weight: 0.64
, mussel
Weight: 0.61
, cephalopod
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered evolved invertebrates 1.00
be considered most evolved invertebrates 0.99
be considered invertebrates 0.93
is invertebrates 0.90
be different from invertebrates 0.90
is complex invertebrates 0.89
be different from other invertebrates 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, is invertebrates)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(cephalopod, is invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(cephalopod, is invertebrates)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, be considered most evolved invertebrates)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(mollusk, is invertebrates)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(mollusk, be considered invertebrates)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, be considered invertebrates)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(mollusk, is invertebrates)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, is complex invertebrates)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, be different from invertebrates)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, is invertebrates)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, be different from other invertebrates)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(mollusk, is invertebrates)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(mollusk, be considered invertebrates)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(mollusk, be considered invertebrates)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(mollusk, be considered most evolved invertebrates)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(mollusk, be different from invertebrates)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(mollusk, be different from invertebrates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(mollusk, be different from other invertebrates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(mollusk, is complex invertebrates)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(mollusk, be different from invertebrates)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(mollusk, be considered most evolved invertebrates)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(mollusk, be different from other invertebrates)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(mollusk, be considered most evolved invertebrates)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(mollusk, be different from other invertebrates)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(mollusk, is complex invertebrates)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mollusk, is complex invertebrates)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, be considered evolved invertebrates)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(cephalopod, is invertebrates)