mollusk: has physical part eyes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.64
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.60
, organism
Weight: 0.57
, fossil
Weight: 0.50
Siblings octopus
Weight: 0.67
, snail
Weight: 0.64
, mussel
Weight: 0.61
, cephalopod
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part eyes 1.00
have complex eyes 0.83
has physical part system 0.81
has physical part beaks 0.79
has physical part gills 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.66
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(mollusk, has physical part eyes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(animal, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(octopus, has physical part eyes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, has physical part system)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cephalopod, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(animal, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(mollusk, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(octopus, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(octopus, has physical part eyes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(cephalopod, has physical part system)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(cephalopod, has physical part system)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cephalopod, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cephalopod, has physical part beaks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(mollusk, has physical part eyes)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(mollusk, has physical part system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(mollusk, has physical part system)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(mollusk, has physical part gills)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(mollusk, has physical part system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(mollusk, has physical part gills)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part gills)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(mollusk, has physical part beaks)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, have complex eyes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(mollusk, has physical part beaks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mollusk, have complex eyes)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part beaks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(mollusk, has physical part gills)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(mollusk, has physical part beaks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mollusk, have complex eyes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mollusk, have complex eyes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part eyes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(mollusk, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(octopus, has physical part eyes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(cephalopod, has physical part system)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cephalopod, has physical part beaks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(mollusk, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(animal, has physical part eyes)