money laundering: is difficult

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scheme
Weight: 0.67
, business
Weight: 0.67
, crime
Weight: 0.66
, issue
Weight: 0.64
Siblings money
Weight: 0.65
, fraud
Weight: 0.33
, stealing
Weight: 0.33
, bribery
Weight: 0.33
, corruption
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is difficult 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(issue, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(money laundering, is difficult)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(money laundering, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(issue, is difficult)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(money laundering, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, is difficult)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(money laundering, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(corruption, is difficult)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(issue, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(money laundering, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(money laundering, is difficult)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(money laundering, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(corruption, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(corruption, is difficult)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(money laundering, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(money laundering, is difficult)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(money laundering, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(money laundering, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(money laundering, is difficult)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(money laundering, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(money laundering, is difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(money laundering, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(issue, is difficult)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(money laundering, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(corruption, is difficult)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(money laundering, is difficult)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(issue, is difficult)