monitor: be at desk

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.63
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.62
, screen
Weight: 0.60
, equipment
Weight: 0.59
Siblings computer monitor
Weight: 0.39
, electronic device
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, personal computer
Weight: 0.33
, smoke detector
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at desk 1.00
be at surface of desk 0.88
be more expensive than desk top computer 0.80
be at office 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(personal computer, be at desk)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desk top computer)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(computer monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be at desk)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(personal computer, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(personal computer, be at desk)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(laptop computer, be more expensive than desk top computer) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(laptop computer, be more expensive than desk top computer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(monitor, be at desk)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(monitor, be at surface of desk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be at surface of desk)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(monitor, be at surface of desk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monitor, be at surface of desk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(monitor, be at office)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(monitor, be at office)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(monitor, be at office)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be at office)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be at desk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(monitor, be at desk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be at desk)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(personal computer, be at desk)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be at desk) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(laptop computer, be more expensive than desk top computer)