monitor: be better than tvs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.63
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.62
, screen
Weight: 0.60
, interface
Weight: 0.59
Siblings computer monitor
Weight: 0.39
, electronic device
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, network device
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than tvs 1.00
look better than tvs 0.98
be more expensive than tvs 0.96
be cheaper than tvs 0.96
be much cheaper than tvs 0.95
cost more than tvs 0.94
be better than tvs for gaming 0.92
be smoother than tvs 0.90
be better than tv 0.87
be more expensive than than tv 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tv)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tvs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, look better than tvs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tvs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(computer monitor, be better than tv)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be better than tv)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(monitor, be better than tvs)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(monitor, look better than tvs)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(monitor, look better than tvs)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(monitor, cost more than tvs)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(monitor, look better than tvs)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(monitor, cost more than tvs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(monitor, be better than tvs for gaming)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(monitor, be better than tvs for gaming)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(monitor, cost more than tvs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(monitor, be smoother than tvs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(monitor, be smoother than tvs)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs for gaming)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(monitor, be smoother than tvs)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be more expensive than tvs)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs for gaming)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be smoother than tvs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(monitor, look better than tvs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(monitor, cost more than tvs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(monitor, be better than tvs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than than tv)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be better than tv)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(computer monitor, look better than tvs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be cheaper than tvs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be much cheaper than tvs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be better than tvs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be better than tvs)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(computer monitor, be more expensive than tvs)