monitor: be considered out put device

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.63
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.62
, screen
Weight: 0.60
, interface
Weight: 0.59
Siblings computer monitor
Weight: 0.39
, electronic device
Weight: 0.34
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, network device
Weight: 0.33
, cooling device
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered out put device 1.00
be considered out device 0.97
need device drivers 0.79
is output device 0.76
be grouped in device manager 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(device, need device drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(monitor, be considered out put device)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(device, be grouped in device manager) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(monitor, be considered out put device)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(device, need device drivers)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(device, be grouped in device manager)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(device, be grouped in device manager)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(device, need device drivers)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(computer monitor, is output device)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(device, need device drivers) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(monitor, be considered out put device)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(device, be grouped in device manager) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(monitor, be considered out put device)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(computer monitor, is output device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(computer monitor, is output device)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(monitor, be considered out put device)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(monitor, is output device)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(monitor, is output device)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(monitor, is output device)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(monitor, is output device)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be considered out put device)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(monitor, be considered out put device)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(device, need device drivers)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(device, be grouped in device manager)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(computer monitor, is output device)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(device, need device drivers)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(monitor, be considered out put device) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(device, be grouped in device manager)