monkey: be at it natural habitat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.75
, wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.72
, primate
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.70
Siblings spider monkey
Weight: 0.71
, ape
Weight: 0.61
, mandrill
Weight: 0.54
, marmoset
Weight: 0.52
, lemur
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at it natural habitat 1.00
be at his habitat 0.93
be at zoo or tropical forest 0.80
be at arboreal environment 0.80
be at wild forest 0.79
be defined as animal which live in forest 0.78
be at rainforest 0.77
be at tropical forest 0.77
be at forest 0.77
be at madagascar forest 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(monkey, be at it natural habitat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(ape, be at forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(marmoset, be at it natural habitat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(marmoset, be at forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at arboreal environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at his habitat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at it natural habitat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at wild forest)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at rainforest)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at madagascar forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(lemur, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at it natural habitat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(marmoset, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(marmoset, be at it natural habitat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(lemur, be at his habitat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at his habitat)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(lemur, be at arboreal environment)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at arboreal environment)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(lemur, be at wild forest)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at wild forest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(lemur, be at madagascar forest)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at madagascar forest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(lemur, be at rainforest)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at rainforest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(ape, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ape, be at forest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(marmoset, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(marmoset, be at forest)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lemur, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.12
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(monkey, be at it natural habitat)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(monkey, be at rainforest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at rainforest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at rainforest)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(monkey, be at rainforest)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tropical forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(monkey, be at it natural habitat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lemur, be at it natural habitat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(lemur, be at his habitat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(marmoset, be at it natural habitat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lemur, be at wild forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lemur, be at madagascar forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(lemur, be at rainforest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lemur, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(lemur, be at arboreal environment)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(marmoset, be at forest)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ape, be at forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(wild animal, be defined as animal which live in forest)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(monkey, be at it natural habitat)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)