monkey: be at zoo or tropical forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.75
, wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.72
, primate
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.70
Siblings spider monkey
Weight: 0.71
, ape
Weight: 0.61
, mandrill
Weight: 0.54
, marmoset
Weight: 0.52
, lemur
Weight: 0.45

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at zoo or tropical forest 1.00
be at tropical forest 0.95
be at jungle or zoo 0.89
be at zoo or jungle 0.89
be at tropical area 0.87
be at wild forest 0.86
be at forest in madagascar 0.86
be at zoo or dschungle 0.86
be at forest 0.86
be at madagascar forest 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be at forest)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(ape, be at forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(marmoset, be at forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at zoo or jungle)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at wild forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at madagascar forest)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(marmoset, be at jungle or zoo)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(wild animal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(marmoset, be at jungle or zoo)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(marmoset, be at jungle or zoo)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(lemur, be at zoo or jungle)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at zoo or jungle)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(lemur, be at madagascar forest)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at madagascar forest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(ape, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(ape, be at forest)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(lemur, be at wild forest)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at wild forest)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(marmoset, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(marmoset, be at forest)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lemur, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(lemur, be at forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or dschungle)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(monkey, be at tropical forest)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or dschungle)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(monkey, be at zoo or dschungle)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(monkey, be at zoo or dschungle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(lemur, be at madagascar forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(lemur, be at wild forest)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(marmoset, be at jungle or zoo)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(lemur, be at forest in madagascar)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(lemur, be at forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(lemur, be at zoo or jungle)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(marmoset, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(ape, be at forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monkey, be at zoo or tropical forest)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(wild animal, be at forest)