monkey: be in rainforest

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.75
, wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.72
, primate
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.70
Siblings baboon
Weight: 0.77
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.71
, ape
Weight: 0.61
, red panda
Weight: 0.60
, mandrill
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in rainforest 1.00
be important to rainforest 0.98
be in rainforest move 0.96
keep in rainforest 0.96
survive in rainforest 0.94
sound in rainforest 0.94
keep in tropical rainforest 0.92
live in rainforests 0.92
adapt in rainforest 0.91
adapt to rainforest 0.91

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(spider monkey, be important to rainforest)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(spider monkey, adapt in rainforest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(spider monkey, adapt in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(spider monkey, adapt in rainforest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(spider monkey, be important to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(spider monkey, be important to rainforest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(monkey, be in rainforest)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(monkey, survive in rainforest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(monkey, sound in rainforest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(monkey, survive in rainforest)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(monkey, sound in rainforest)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(monkey, sound in rainforest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(monkey, sound in rainforest)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(monkey, survive in rainforest)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(monkey, survive in rainforest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(monkey, adapt in rainforest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(monkey, adapt to rainforest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(monkey, adapt to rainforest)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(monkey, adapt to rainforest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(monkey, adapt in rainforest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(monkey, adapt in rainforest)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(monkey, adapt to rainforest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(monkey, adapt in rainforest)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(monkey, be important to rainforest)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be important to rainforest)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(monkey, be important to rainforest)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(monkey, be important to rainforest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be in rainforest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(monkey, be in rainforest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(spider monkey, be important to rainforest)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be in rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(spider monkey, adapt in rainforest)