monkey: be to tree

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.75
, wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.72
, primate
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.70
Siblings baboon
Weight: 0.77
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.71
, ape
Weight: 0.61
, red panda
Weight: 0.60
, mandrill
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to tree 1.00
swing from tree to tree 0.94
be in trees 0.91
live in trees 0.87
live on trees 0.87
swing from trees to trees 0.87
living on trees 0.85
swing from tree 0.85
swing from treee to tree 0.85
get leaves from trees 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in trees)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(red panda, live in trees)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(red panda, live in trees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(monkey, be to tree)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(monkey, swing from tree to tree)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(monkey, swing from tree to tree)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(monkey, swing from tree to tree)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(monkey, swing from tree)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(monkey, swing from tree)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(monkey, swing from tree)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(monkey, swing from tree to tree)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(monkey, live in trees)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(monkey, live in trees)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(monkey, live on trees)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(monkey, live in trees)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(monkey, live on trees)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(monkey, live on trees)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(monkey, swing from tree)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(monkey, live on trees)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(monkey, live in trees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be to tree)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(monkey, be to tree)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(monkey, be to tree)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(red panda, live in trees)