monkey: live in trees

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.75
, wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.72
, primate
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.70
Siblings baboon
Weight: 0.77
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.71
, ape
Weight: 0.61
, red panda
Weight: 0.60
, mandrill
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
live in trees 1.00
live on trees 0.99
be in trees 0.95
living on trees 0.95
stay in trees 0.92
stay on trees 0.91
swing from trees to trees 0.90
get leaves from trees 0.88
sleep in trees 0.87
hang from trees 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(monkey, live in trees)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(red panda, live in trees)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(monkey, live in trees)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(red panda, live in trees)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(red panda, live in trees)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(monkey, live in trees)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(monkey, live in trees)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(monkey, live in trees)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(monkey, live on trees)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(monkey, live in trees)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(monkey, live on trees)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(monkey, live in trees)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(monkey, live on trees)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(monkey, live in trees)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(monkey, live on trees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(monkey, live in trees)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(monkey, live in trees)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(monkey, live in trees)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(monkey, live in trees)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(monkey, live in trees)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(monkey, live in trees)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(red panda, live in trees)