monkey: stay in winter

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.75
, mammal
Weight: 0.72
, primate
Weight: 0.70
, pet
Weight: 0.70
Siblings baboon
Weight: 0.77
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.71
, ape
Weight: 0.61
, red panda
Weight: 0.60
, mandrill
Weight: 0.54

Related properties

Property Similarity
stay in winter 1.00
survive in winter 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(monkey, stay in winter)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ape, survive in winter)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(monkey, stay in winter)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(red panda, survive in winter)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(monkey, stay in winter)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(red panda, survive in winter)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(red panda, survive in winter)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(monkey, stay in winter)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ape, survive in winter)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ape, survive in winter)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(monkey, stay in winter)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(monkey, stay in winter)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(monkey, stay in winter)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(monkey, survive in winter)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(monkey, stay in winter)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(monkey, survive in winter)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(monkey, stay in winter)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(monkey, survive in winter)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(monkey, stay in winter)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(monkey, survive in winter)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(monkey, stay in winter)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(monkey, stay in winter)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(monkey, stay in winter)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(monkey, stay in winter)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(monkey, stay in winter)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(monkey, stay in winter)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ape, survive in winter)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(monkey, stay in winter)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(red panda, survive in winter)