mono: be called disease

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.51
, factor
Weight: 0.50
, infection
Weight: 0.47
, type
Weight: 0.46
, artist
Weight: 0.45
Siblings bronchitis
Weight: 0.31
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.31
, gastroenteritis
Weight: 0.31
, tonsillitis
Weight: 0.31
, cd player
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called disease 1.00
has state disease 0.93
be known as disease 0.92
be called kissing disease 0.83
be known as kissing disease 0.81
is kissing disease 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, be called disease)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(lyme disease, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, be called disease)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(mono, be called disease)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(mono, be called kissing disease)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(mono, be called kissing disease)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(mono, be called kissing disease)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(mono, is kissing disease)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(mono, is kissing disease)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(mono, is kissing disease)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(mono, be called kissing disease)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mono, be known as kissing disease)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(mono, be known as kissing disease)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(mono, is kissing disease)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(mono, be known as kissing disease)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mono, be known as kissing disease)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(mono, has state disease)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mono, has state disease)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(mono, be known as disease)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(mono, be known as disease)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(mono, has state disease)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(mono, has state disease)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(mono, be known as disease)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(mono, be known as disease)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mono, be called disease)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(mono, be called disease)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mono, be called disease) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(lyme disease, be called disease)