mono: has quality evil

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.51
, factor
Weight: 0.50
, infection
Weight: 0.47
, type
Weight: 0.46
, artist
Weight: 0.45
Siblings bronchitis
Weight: 0.31
, lyme disease
Weight: 0.31
, gastroenteritis
Weight: 0.31
, tonsillitis
Weight: 0.31
, cd player
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality evil 1.00
has quality bad 0.80
has quality good 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(infection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(mono, has quality evil)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(infection, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(infection, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(bronchitis, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(infection, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(mono, has quality evil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(lyme disease, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(bronchitis, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(bronchitis, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(mono, has quality evil)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(mono, has quality bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mono, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(mono, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(mono, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(mono, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(mono, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(mono, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(mono, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mono, has quality evil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(mono, has quality evil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(infection, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(lyme disease, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(bronchitis, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(mono, has quality evil)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(infection, has quality bad)