monopoly: be bad for capitalism

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board game
Weight: 0.62
, combination
Weight: 0.56
, word
Weight: 0.56
, title
Weight: 0.54
, game
Weight: 0.54
Siblings capitalism
Weight: 0.31
, taboo
Weight: 0.31
, mafia
Weight: 0.31
, dominion
Weight: 0.30
, silence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for capitalism 1.00
be dangerous in capitalism 0.96
be dangerous in capitalist economy 0.90
be bad for economy 0.77
be good for economy 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be bad for economy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for economy)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(capitalism, be bad for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(capitalism, be bad for economy)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(capitalism, be good for economy) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(capitalism, be good for economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(monopoly, be bad for capitalism)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be dangerous in capitalism)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be dangerous in capitalist economy)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be bad for economy)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be good for economy)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be dangerous in capitalist economy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(monopoly, be dangerous in capitalism)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(monopoly, be dangerous in capitalist economy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(monopoly, be dangerous in capitalism)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be dangerous in capitalism)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(monopoly, be good for economy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(monopoly, be dangerous in capitalist economy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(monopoly, be bad for economy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for economy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(monopoly, be bad for economy)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(monopoly, be good for economy)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for capitalism)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(monopoly, be bad for capitalism)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(capitalism, be bad for economy)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for capitalism) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(capitalism, be good for economy)