monopoly: be harmful to american consumers

Property	Similarity
be harmful to american consumers	1.00
be harmful to consumers	0.93
be bad for consumers	0.88
bad for consumers	0.88
harm consumers	0.87
be good for consumers	0.87
be considered harmful	0.76

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(monopoly, be harmful to consumers)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(monopoly, be bad for consumers)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(monopoly, be harmful to consumers)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Plausible(monopoly, bad for consumers)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(monopoly, harm consumers)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Salient(monopoly, bad for consumers)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Plausible(monopoly, be good for consumers)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Salient(monopoly, be bad for consumers)

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(monopoly, be good for consumers)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(monopoly, be harmful to consumers)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Salient(monopoly, harm consumers)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be good for consumers)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(monopoly, bad for consumers)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(monopoly, be bad for consumers)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(monopoly, harm consumers)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(monopoly, bad for consumers)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(monopoly, be good for consumers)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.98

Plausible(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(monopoly, be considered harmful)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for consumers)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(monopoly, be considered harmful)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.92

Salient(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(monopoly, be considered harmful)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be harmful to consumers)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(monopoly, harm consumers)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.69

Remarkable(monopoly, be harmful to american consumers) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be considered harmful)

Parents	board game Weight: 0.62 , combination Weight: 0.56 , word Weight: 0.56 , title Weight: 0.54 , game Weight: 0.54
Siblings	capitalism Weight: 0.31 , taboo Weight: 0.31 , mafia Weight: 0.31 , dominion Weight: 0.30 , silence Weight: 0.30

monopoly: be harmful to american consumers

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible