monopoly: be said allocatively inefficient

Property	Similarity
be said allocatively inefficient	1.00
be said inefficient	1.00
be pareto inefficient	0.94
be inefficient	0.94
is inefficient	0.94
is allocatively inefficient	0.94
is productively inefficient	0.82
is allocatively efficient	0.75
is efficient	0.75

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(monopoly, is inefficient)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(monopoly, be inefficient)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Typical(monopoly, is allocatively inefficient)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.35

¬ Plausible(monopoly, is inefficient)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(monopoly, be inefficient)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(monopoly, is allocatively inefficient)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is allocatively inefficient)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be inefficient)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is inefficient)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is allocatively efficient)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(monopoly, be inefficient)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Salient(monopoly, is inefficient)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(monopoly, is allocatively efficient)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Salient(monopoly, is allocatively inefficient)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(monopoly, is allocatively efficient)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is productively inefficient)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(monopoly, is allocatively efficient)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(monopoly, is productively inefficient)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.63

Salient(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(monopoly, is productively inefficient)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.51

Plausible(monopoly, be said allocatively inefficient) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(monopoly, is productively inefficient)

Parents	board game Weight: 0.62 , combination Weight: 0.56 , word Weight: 0.56 , title Weight: 0.54 , game Weight: 0.54
Siblings	capitalism Weight: 0.31 , taboo Weight: 0.31 , mafia Weight: 0.31 , dominion Weight: 0.30 , silence Weight: 0.30

monopoly: be said allocatively inefficient

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings