monopoly: is bad for

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board game
Weight: 0.62
, combination
Weight: 0.56
, word
Weight: 0.56
, title
Weight: 0.54
, game
Weight: 0.54
Siblings capitalism
Weight: 0.31
, taboo
Weight: 0.31
, mafia
Weight: 0.31
, dominion
Weight: 0.30
, silence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad for 1.00
is bad thing 0.88
be good 0.87
has quality bad 0.87
be known bad 0.84
be bad for economy 0.82
be bad for competition 0.79
has quality good 0.79
is good game 0.78
be good for economy 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(game, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(game, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(board game, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(title, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monopoly, is bad for)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(title, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(word, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(board game, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(game, has quality bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(game, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(title, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(word, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(game, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board game, has quality good)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(game, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silence, is bad thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(taboo, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be bad for economy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(mafia, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, is bad thing)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, be good for economy)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(game, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(word, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(game, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(board game, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(title, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(capitalism, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(capitalism, is bad thing)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(silence, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(silence, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(silence, is bad thing)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(silence, is bad thing)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(taboo, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(taboo, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(capitalism, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(capitalism, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silence, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(silence, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(mafia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mafia, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(capitalism, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(capitalism, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(capitalism, be good for economy)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(capitalism, be good for economy)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(capitalism, be bad for economy)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(capitalism, be bad for economy)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(monopoly, is bad for)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be good)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(monopoly, is bad thing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(monopoly, be good)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for economy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(monopoly, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be good for economy)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(monopoly, be known bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is bad thing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monopoly, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be known bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(monopoly, be bad for economy)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(monopoly, be known bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(monopoly, be good for economy)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be known bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad thing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be bad for economy)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(monopoly, is bad thing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be good for economy)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(monopoly, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(monopoly, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for competition)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(monopoly, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(monopoly, is good game)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(monopoly, be bad for economy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(monopoly, be good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(monopoly, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(monopoly, be bad for competition)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is good game)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be bad for competition)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(monopoly, be good for economy)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(monopoly, be bad for competition)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(monopoly, is good game)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monopoly, is bad for)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(title, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(board game, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(game, has quality bad)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(game, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(taboo, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(silence, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(silence, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(silence, is bad thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(capitalism, is bad thing)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(capitalism, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(capitalism, be bad for economy)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(capitalism, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(capitalism, be good for economy)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(mafia, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(title, has quality bad)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(board game, has quality good)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(word, has quality bad)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(game, has quality bad)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(game, has quality good)