monopoly: is good game

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents board game
Weight: 0.62
, combination
Weight: 0.56
, word
Weight: 0.56
, title
Weight: 0.54
, game
Weight: 0.54
Siblings capitalism
Weight: 0.31
, taboo
Weight: 0.31
, mafia
Weight: 0.31
, dominion
Weight: 0.30
, silence
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good game 1.00
is game 0.94
be good 0.83
is successful board game 0.81
is board game 0.81
is bad for 0.78
is bad thing 0.77
has quality good 0.76
be bad for competition 0.76
is perfect competition 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(game, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(monopoly, is good game)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(board game, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(monopoly, is good game)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(board game, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(game, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(board game, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(game, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(taboo, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(silence, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(silence, is bad thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(dominion, is game)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, is bad thing)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(capitalism, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(game, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is good game)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(board game, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is good game)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(dominion, is game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(dominion, is game)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(taboo, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(taboo, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(silence, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(silence, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(capitalism, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(capitalism, is bad thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(capitalism, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(capitalism, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(silence, is bad thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(silence, is bad thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(monopoly, is good game)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(monopoly, is game)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is game)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is successful board game)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(monopoly, is successful board game)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is successful board game)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is perfect competition)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(monopoly, is perfect competition)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is perfect competition)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(monopoly, be good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(monopoly, is bad thing)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(monopoly, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(monopoly, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(monopoly, is board game)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(monopoly, is perfect competition)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(monopoly, is successful board game)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(monopoly, be good)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(monopoly, is bad for)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is bad thing)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(monopoly, is game)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(monopoly, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is bad for)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(monopoly, is board game)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(monopoly, be bad for competition)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(monopoly, is bad for)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(monopoly, be bad for competition)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(monopoly, is bad thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(monopoly, is board game)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(monopoly, be bad for competition)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad for)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is game)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, be bad for competition)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is board game)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is bad thing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(monopoly, is good game)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(board game, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(game, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(taboo, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(silence, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(silence, is bad thing)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(dominion, is game)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(capitalism, is bad thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(capitalism, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(board game, has quality good)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monopoly, is good game) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(game, has quality good)