monotreme: be different from other types of mammals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, marsupial
Weight: 0.48
, animal
Weight: 0.39
, bird
Weight: 0.26
Siblings platypus
Weight: 0.60
, echidna
Weight: 0.51
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.36
, blue whale
Weight: 0.35
, whale
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different from other types of mammals 1.00
be different from types of mammals 0.99
be different from other mammals 0.97
be different from mammals 0.95
be similar to other mammals 0.94
be similar to mammals 0.91
be same as mammals 0.90
be different from other types 0.90
be different from other animals 0.89
be different from types 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mammal, be different from other animals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(marsupial, be different from other mammals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(marsupial, be same as mammals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(marsupial, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(marsupial, be similar to mammals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(marsupial, be different from mammals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(marsupial, be similar to mammals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(marsupial, be different from other mammals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(marsupial, be same as mammals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(mammal, be different from other animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, be different from other mammals)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, be different from mammals)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, be same as mammals)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be different from other animals)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, be similar to mammals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(echidna, be different from other mammals)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(marsupial, be different from other mammals)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(mammal, be different from other animals)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(marsupial, be same as mammals)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(marsupial, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(marsupial, be similar to mammals)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(echidna, be different from mammals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(echidna, be different from mammals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(echidna, be different from other mammals)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(echidna, be different from other mammals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from types of mammals)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from mammals)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(monotreme, be similar to mammals)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be different from mammals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from other mammals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be similar to mammals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from types)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be different from types of mammals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(monotreme, be same as mammals)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(monotreme, be different from mammals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(monotreme, be different from other mammals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be different from types)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be different from other mammals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(monotreme, be different from other types)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from other types)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(monotreme, be different from other animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monotreme, be similar to other mammals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(monotreme, be different from types)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be same as mammals)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other mammals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(monotreme, be similar to mammals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(monotreme, be same as mammals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be different from other animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from other animals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(monotreme, be different from types of mammals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be similar to other mammals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be similar to other mammals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(monotreme, be similar to other mammals)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from types)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be same as mammals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from mammals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from types of mammals)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be similar to mammals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(marsupial, be different from mammals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(marsupial, be different from other mammals)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(marsupial, be similar to mammals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(marsupial, be same as mammals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(mammal, be different from other animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(echidna, be different from mammals)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(echidna, be different from other mammals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(marsupial, be different from mammals)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(marsupial, be different from other mammals)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(marsupial, be similar to mammals)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(marsupial, be same as mammals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(monotreme, be different from other types of mammals)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(mammal, be different from other animals)