monotreme: be regarded as primitive mammals

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mammal
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.51
, marsupial
Weight: 0.48
, animal
Weight: 0.39
, bird
Weight: 0.26
Siblings platypus
Weight: 0.60
, echidna
Weight: 0.51
, humpback whale
Weight: 0.36
, blue whale
Weight: 0.35
, whale
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be regarded as primitive mammals 1.00
be regarded as mammals 0.94
be regarded primitive 0.93
be regarded very primitive 0.91
be considered primitive 0.91
be considered mammals 0.89
is primitive 0.87
be classified as mammals 0.87
be same as mammals 0.87
have classed as mammals marsupials 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(marsupial, be same as mammals)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(marsupial, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(marsupial, be considered mammals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(marsupial, be same as mammals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, be considered mammals)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(marsupial, be same as mammals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, be considered mammals)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(blue whale, be classified as mammals)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(marsupial, be same as mammals)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(marsupial, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(blue whale, be considered mammals)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(blue whale, be considered mammals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(blue whale, be classified as mammals)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(blue whale, be classified as mammals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(monotreme, is primitive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(monotreme, be regarded primitive)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(monotreme, be considered primitive)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be considered primitive)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(monotreme, is primitive)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(monotreme, be regarded as mammals)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(monotreme, be regarded very primitive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(monotreme, be classified as mammals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be regarded very primitive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(monotreme, be considered primitive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(monotreme, be regarded very primitive)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be regarded primitive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as mammals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded very primitive)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be classified as mammals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(monotreme, be same as mammals)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(monotreme, be regarded as mammals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(monotreme, be classified as mammals)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(monotreme, be same as mammals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(monotreme, be same as mammals)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(monotreme, be regarded primitive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(monotreme, is primitive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered primitive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as mammals)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be same as mammals)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be classified as mammals)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded primitive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be considered mammals)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(monotreme, have classed as mammals marsupials)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, is primitive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(marsupial, be considered mammals)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(marsupial, be same as mammals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(blue whale, be considered mammals)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(blue whale, be classified as mammals)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(marsupial, be considered mammals)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(monotreme, be regarded as primitive mammals)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(marsupial, be same as mammals)