montana: be state

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, area
Weight: 0.57
, state
Weight: 0.54
, colorado
Weight: 0.53
, location
Weight: 0.51
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.34
, wyoming
Weight: 0.34
, north carolina
Weight: 0.34
, mississippi
Weight: 0.34
, south dakota
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be state 1.00
be one state of many 0.86
bring on other state 0.81
be defined as least populous state 0.78
be a part of unite state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(state, bring on other state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(montana, be state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(state, bring on other state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(state, bring on other state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(south dakota, be one state of many)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, be defined as least populous state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(state, bring on other state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(montana, be state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(south dakota, be one state of many) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(south dakota, be one state of many)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(wyoming, be defined as least populous state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(wyoming, be defined as least populous state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(montana, be state)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(montana, be a part of unite state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(montana, be a part of unite state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(montana, be a part of unite state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(montana, be a part of unite state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(montana, be state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(montana, be state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(state, bring on other state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(south dakota, be one state of many)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(wyoming, be defined as least populous state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(montana, be state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(state, bring on other state)