montana: is last best place

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, area
Weight: 0.57
, state
Weight: 0.54
, united states
Weight: 0.53
, colorado
Weight: 0.53
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.34
, wyoming
Weight: 0.34
, delaware
Weight: 0.34
, north carolina
Weight: 0.34
, idaho
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is last best place 1.00
be called last best place 0.98
is best place 0.94
is last place 0.94
be called best place 0.92
be called last place 0.91
is place 0.84
is best state 0.84
be good place live 0.83
be called place 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(colorado, is best state)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(montana, is last best place)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(colorado, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(colorado, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(delaware, be good place live)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, is place)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(colorado, is best state)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(montana, is last best place)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(wyoming, is place)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(wyoming, is place)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(delaware, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(delaware, be good place live)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(idaho, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(idaho, be good place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(montana, is last best place)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(montana, be called last best place)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(montana, be called last best place)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(montana, is best place)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(montana, is last place)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(montana, be called best place)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(montana, be called last best place)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(montana, is best place)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(montana, is last place)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(montana, be called last place)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(montana, be called best place)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(montana, is last place)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(montana, is best place)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(montana, be called last place)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(montana, be called best place)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(montana, be called last place)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(montana, is place)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(montana, is place)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(montana, is place)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(montana, is best state)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(montana, be good place live)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(montana, be good place live)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(montana, is best state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(montana, be called place)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(montana, be called last best place)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(montana, be called place)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(montana, be good place live)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(montana, is best state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(montana, be called place)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(montana, be called last place)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(montana, be called best place)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(montana, is best place)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(montana, is last place)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(montana, is best state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(montana, be good place live)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(montana, be called place)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(montana, is place)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(montana, is last best place)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(montana, is last best place)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(colorado, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(wyoming, is place)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(delaware, be good place live)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(idaho, be good place live)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(montana, is last best place)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(colorado, is best state)