montana: is populated

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, area
Weight: 0.57
, state
Weight: 0.54
, united states
Weight: 0.53
, colorado
Weight: 0.53
Siblings south carolina
Weight: 0.34
, wyoming
Weight: 0.34
, delaware
Weight: 0.34
, north carolina
Weight: 0.34
, idaho
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is populated 1.00
is sparsely populated 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(montana, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, is populated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(montana, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(wyoming, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(wyoming, is populated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(montana, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(montana, is populated)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(montana, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(montana, is sparsely populated)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(montana, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(montana, is sparsely populated)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(montana, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(montana, is sparsely populated)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(montana, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(montana, is sparsely populated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(montana, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(montana, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(montana, is populated)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(montana, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(montana, is populated)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(montana, is populated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(wyoming, is populated)