montreal: be as tech city

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.57
, quebec
Weight: 0.57
Siblings ottawa
Weight: 0.53
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, toronto
Weight: 0.36
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, las vegas
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be as tech city 1.00
is city 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new york, is city)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(montreal, be as tech city)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(new york, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(new york, is city)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, is city)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(toronto, is city)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(philadelphia, is city)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new york city, is city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(new york, is city)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(montreal, be as tech city)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(new york city, is city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new york city, is city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(philadelphia, is city)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(philadelphia, is city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(toronto, is city)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(toronto, is city)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ottawa, is city)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(ottawa, is city)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(montreal, be as tech city)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(montreal, is city)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(montreal, is city)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(montreal, is city)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(montreal, is city)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be as tech city)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(montreal, be as tech city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, is city)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new york city, is city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(philadelphia, is city)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(toronto, is city)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(ottawa, is city)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(montreal, be as tech city)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(new york, is city)