montreal: be better than toronto

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.57
, quebec
Weight: 0.57
Siblings ottawa
Weight: 0.53
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, toronto
Weight: 0.36
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, las vegas
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than toronto 1.00
be colder than toronto 0.93
be called montreal 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be better than toronto)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, be better than toronto)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(montreal, be better than toronto)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ottawa, be better than toronto)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(ottawa, be better than toronto)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(montreal, be better than toronto)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(montreal, be better than toronto)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(montreal, be better than toronto)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be colder than toronto)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(montreal, be better than toronto)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(montreal, be colder than toronto)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(montreal, be better than toronto)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(montreal, be colder than toronto)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(montreal, be better than toronto)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(montreal, be called montreal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(montreal, be better than toronto)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(montreal, be colder than toronto)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(montreal, be better than toronto)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(montreal, be called montreal)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(montreal, be better than toronto)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(montreal, be called montreal)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(montreal, be better than toronto)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be called montreal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(montreal, be better than toronto)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(montreal, be better than toronto)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be better than toronto)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(montreal, be better than toronto)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(montreal, be better than toronto)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be better than toronto)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(ottawa, be better than toronto)