montreal: be colder than toronto

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.57
, quebec
Weight: 0.57
Siblings ottawa
Weight: 0.53
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, toronto
Weight: 0.36
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, las vegas
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be colder than toronto 1.00
be better than toronto 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be colder than toronto)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(ottawa, be better than toronto)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(montreal, be colder than toronto)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(ottawa, be better than toronto)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(ottawa, be better than toronto)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(montreal, be colder than toronto)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(montreal, be colder than toronto)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.52
Typical(montreal, be colder than toronto)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(montreal, be better than toronto)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(montreal, be colder than toronto)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be better than toronto)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(montreal, be colder than toronto)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(montreal, be better than toronto)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(montreal, be colder than toronto)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(montreal, be better than toronto)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(montreal, be colder than toronto)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(montreal, be colder than toronto)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be colder than toronto)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(montreal, be colder than toronto)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(montreal, be colder than toronto)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be colder than toronto)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(ottawa, be better than toronto)