montreal: be island of french

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.64
, place
Weight: 0.62
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, town
Weight: 0.57
, quebec
Weight: 0.57
Siblings ottawa
Weight: 0.53
, new york city
Weight: 0.36
, toronto
Weight: 0.36
, philadelphia
Weight: 0.36
, las vegas
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be island of french 1.00
is french 0.89
is island 0.84
speak french 0.82
was appealing to french 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(quebec, is french)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(montreal, be island of french)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(quebec, speak french)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(montreal, be island of french)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(quebec, is french)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(quebec, speak french)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(quebec, speak french)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(quebec, is french)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is island)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(quebec, is french)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(montreal, be island of french)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(quebec, speak french)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(montreal, be island of french)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(las vegas, is island)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is island)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(montreal, be island of french)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(montreal, is island)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(montreal, is french)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(montreal, is french)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(montreal, is island)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(montreal, is french)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(montreal, is island)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(montreal, speak french)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(montreal, is french)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(montreal, speak french)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(montreal, speak french)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(montreal, was appealing to french)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(montreal, speak french)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(montreal, is island)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(montreal, was appealing to french)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(montreal, was appealing to french)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(montreal, was appealing to french)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be island of french)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(montreal, be island of french)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(quebec, is french)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quebec, speak french)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(las vegas, is island)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(quebec, is french)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(montreal, be island of french)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(quebec, speak french)