moss: grow well in tundra

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents plant
Weight: 0.62
, material
Weight: 0.61
, habitat
Weight: 0.59
, player
Weight: 0.57
, species
Weight: 0.56
Siblings spanish moss
Weight: 0.35
, horsetail
Weight: 0.35
, hydrangea
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
grow well in tundra 1.00
grow well in arctic tundra 0.96
live in tundra 0.91
adapt in tundra environment 0.89
grow in savannah 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(moss, grow well in tundra)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(spanish moss, grow in savannah)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(moss, grow well in tundra)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(spanish moss, grow in savannah)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(spanish moss, grow in savannah)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(moss, grow well in tundra)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(moss, grow well in tundra)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(moss, grow well in tundra)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(moss, live in tundra)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(moss, grow well in tundra)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(moss, live in tundra)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(moss, grow well in tundra)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(moss, live in tundra)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(moss, grow well in tundra)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(moss, adapt in tundra environment)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(moss, grow well in tundra)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(moss, live in tundra)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(moss, grow well in tundra)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(moss, adapt in tundra environment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(moss, grow well in tundra)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(moss, adapt in tundra environment)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(moss, grow well in tundra)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(moss, adapt in tundra environment)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(moss, grow well in tundra)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(moss, grow well in tundra)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(moss, grow well in tundra)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(moss, grow well in tundra)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(moss, grow well in tundra)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(moss, grow well in tundra)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(spanish moss, grow in savannah)