most animals: be white in tundra

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be white in tundra 1.00
be in arctic region 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(most animals, be white in tundra)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(most animals, be white in tundra)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(most animals, be white in tundra)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(most animals, be in arctic region)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(most animals, be white in tundra)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(most animals, be in arctic region)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(most animals, be white in tundra)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(most animals, be in arctic region)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(most animals, be white in tundra)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(most animals, be in arctic region)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(most animals, be white in tundra)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(most animals, be white in tundra)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(most animals, be white in tundra)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(most animals, be white in tundra)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(most animals, be white in tundra)