most people: get around in france

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents many people
Weight: 0.80
, other people
Weight: 0.66
, time
Weight: 0.64
, country
Weight: 0.63
Siblings older people
Weight: 0.70
, business people
Weight: 0.66
, poor people
Weight: 0.66
, meteorologist
Weight: 0.46

Related properties

Property Similarity
get around in france 1.00
get around in poland 0.85
speak french in canada 0.80
be in germany 0.80
be in switzerland 0.78
be in brazil 0.78
be in sweden 0.78
be in latin america 0.78
be in africa 0.77
be in america 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(many people, be in latin america)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(most people, get around in france)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(country, be in africa)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(most people, get around in france)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(country, be in africa)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(many people, be in latin america)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(many people, be in latin america)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(country, be in africa)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(poor people, be in brazil)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(many people, be in latin america)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(most people, get around in france)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(country, be in africa)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(most people, get around in france)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(poor people, be in brazil)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(poor people, be in brazil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(most people, get around in france)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(most people, get around in poland)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(most people, get around in poland)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(most people, get around in poland)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(most people, speak french in canada)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(most people, get around in poland)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(most people, be in brazil)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(most people, speak french in canada)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(most people, be in america)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(most people, speak french in canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(most people, speak french in canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(most people, be in brazil)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(most people, be in america)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(most people, be in brazil)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(most people, be in america)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(most people, be in brazil)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(most people, be in america)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(most people, get around in france)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(most people, get around in france)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(country, be in africa)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(many people, be in latin america)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(poor people, be in brazil)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(country, be in africa)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(most people, get around in france)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(many people, be in latin america)