most people: get around in poland

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents many people
Weight: 0.80
, other people
Weight: 0.66
, time
Weight: 0.64
, country
Weight: 0.63
Siblings older people
Weight: 0.70
, business people
Weight: 0.66
, poor people
Weight: 0.66
, meteorologist
Weight: 0.46

Related properties

Property Similarity
get around in poland 1.00
get around in france 0.85
be in switzerland 0.81
travel in russia 0.79
be in sweden 0.79
be in germany 0.79
be in brazil 0.77
speak french in canada 0.76
be in cuba 0.76
be in mexico work 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(poor people, be in brazil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(poor people, be in brazil) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(poor people, be in brazil)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(most people, get around in poland)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(most people, get around in france)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(most people, get around in france)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(most people, get around in france)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(most people, travel in russia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(most people, travel in russia)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(most people, be in brazil)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(most people, speak french in canada)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(most people, travel in russia)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(most people, be in brazil)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(most people, get around in france)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(most people, speak french in canada)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(most people, be in brazil)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(most people, speak french in canada)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(most people, travel in russia)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(most people, speak french in canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(most people, be in brazil)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(most people, get around in poland)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(most people, get around in poland)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(most people, get around in poland) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(poor people, be in brazil)