motel: be cheaper than hotels

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents facility
Weight: 0.63
, restaurant
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.60
, lodging
Weight: 0.59
, room
Weight: 0.59
Siblings hotel room
Weight: 0.37
, laundry room
Weight: 0.36
, dining room
Weight: 0.34
, campground
Weight: 0.34
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cheaper than hotels 1.00
is expensive 0.77
be called motels 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(room, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(facility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(motel, be cheaper than hotels)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(facility, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(room, is expensive)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(facility, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, is expensive)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(room, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hotel room, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(restaurant, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(room, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(facility, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(motel, be cheaper than hotels)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hotel room, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(hotel room, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(motel, be cheaper than hotels)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(motel, is expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(motel, be called motels)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(motel, be called motels)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(motel, is expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(motel, be called motels)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(motel, be called motels)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(motel, is expensive)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(motel, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Salient(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(motel, be cheaper than hotels)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(motel, be cheaper than hotels)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(room, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(hotel room, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(facility, is expensive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(room, is expensive)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(motel, be cheaper than hotels)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(restaurant, is expensive)