moth: vibrate wings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.72
, insect
Weight: 0.67
, thing
Weight: 0.63
, species
Weight: 0.59
, arthropod
Weight: 0.59
Siblings gypsy moth
Weight: 0.70
, sphinx
Weight: 0.57
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.39
, wasp
Weight: 0.38
, beetle
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
vibrate wings 1.00
vibrate 0.92
flutter wings 0.82
flap wings 0.79
has physical part wings 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(moth, vibrate wings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(insect, has physical part wings)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(wasp, flutter wings)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(wasp, flap wings)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(wasp, has physical part wings)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(beetle, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(insect, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(moth, vibrate wings)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(wasp, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(wasp, has physical part wings)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(beetle, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(beetle, has physical part wings)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(wasp, flutter wings)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(wasp, flutter wings)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(wasp, flap wings)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(wasp, flap wings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(moth, vibrate wings)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(moth, flutter wings)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(moth, flutter wings)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(moth, flap wings)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(moth, flap wings)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(moth, has physical part wings)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(moth, has physical part wings)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(moth, has physical part wings)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(moth, flutter wings)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(moth, flap wings)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(moth, has physical part wings)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(moth, flutter wings)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(moth, flap wings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(moth, vibrate wings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(moth, vibrate wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(wasp, flutter wings)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(wasp, flap wings)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(wasp, has physical part wings)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(beetle, has physical part wings)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(moth, vibrate wings)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(insect, has physical part wings)