motherboard: go bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.72
, electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, device
Weight: 0.61
, card
Weight: 0.56
Siblings gigabyte
Weight: 0.48
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.38
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.37
, laptop
Weight: 0.37
, router
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
go bad 1.00
be considered bad 0.81
is terrible 0.79
go back to new 0.79
has quality bad 0.79
do 0.78
go over time 0.76
do get overall 0.76
is awful 0.76
go black 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(router, go bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(laptop, go black)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(router, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(router, go bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(laptop, go black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(laptop, go black)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(motherboard, go bad)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(motherboard, do)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(motherboard, do)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(motherboard, do)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, do)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(motherboard, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(motherboard, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(motherboard, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, go bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(motherboard, go bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(router, go bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(motherboard, go bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(laptop, go black)