motor: use dc

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor vehicle
Weight: 0.61
, fuel
Weight: 0.61
, electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, activity
Weight: 0.59
, element
Weight: 0.58
Siblings electric motor
Weight: 0.70
, motorcycle
Weight: 0.60
, motor oil
Weight: 0.37
, diesel engine
Weight: 0.35
, automobile
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
use dc 1.00
use capacitors 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(electronic device, use dc)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(motor, use dc)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(motor, use dc)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(electronic device, use dc)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(motor, use dc)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, use dc)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(electronic device, use dc)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(motor, use dc)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(motor, use dc)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(motor, use dc)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(motor, use dc)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(motor, use dc)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(motor, use capacitors)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(motor, use dc)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(motor, use capacitors)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(motor, use dc)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(motor, use capacitors)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(motor, use dc)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(motor, use capacitors)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(motor, use dc)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(motor, use dc)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(motor, use dc)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(motor, use dc)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(motor, use dc)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(motor, use dc)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(electronic device, use dc)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(motor, use dc)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(electronic device, use dc)