motorcycle: be more efficient fuel

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor vehicle
Weight: 0.73
, vehicle
Weight: 0.66
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.62
, ride
Weight: 0.62
, motor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings honda
Weight: 0.69
, hot rod
Weight: 0.57
, tractor
Weight: 0.56
, atv
Weight: 0.51
, scooter
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more efficient fuel 1.00
is more efficient 0.92
use less fuel 0.91
is efficient 0.91
use fuel 0.89
is fuel 0.88
be more efficient than combustion engines 0.86
reqire fuel types 0.84
run without fuel 0.83
be more expensive than cars 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vehicle, use fuel)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(vehicle, use less fuel)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(vehicle, run without fuel)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(vehicle, run without fuel)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(vehicle, use less fuel)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(vehicle, use fuel)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(vehicle, use less fuel)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(vehicle, run without fuel)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(vehicle, use fuel)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(tractor, is fuel)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(vehicle, use less fuel)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(vehicle, use fuel)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(vehicle, run without fuel)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(tractor, is fuel)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(tractor, is fuel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(motorcycle, be more expensive than cars)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(motorcycle, be more expensive than cars)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be more expensive than cars)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(motorcycle, be more expensive than cars)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(vehicle, use less fuel)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(vehicle, use fuel)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(vehicle, run without fuel)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(tractor, is fuel)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(vehicle, use fuel)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(vehicle, run without fuel)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(vehicle, use less fuel)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(motorcycle, be more efficient fuel)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(motor, be more efficient than combustion engines)