motorcycle: have fenders

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor vehicle
Weight: 0.73
, vehicle
Weight: 0.66
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.62
, ride
Weight: 0.62
, motor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings honda
Weight: 0.69
, hot rod
Weight: 0.57
, tractor
Weight: 0.56
, atv
Weight: 0.51
, scooter
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
have fenders 1.00
come with fenders 0.98
have rear fenders 0.97
have rims 0.82
have rear wheels 0.81
have big rear wheels 0.80
have large rear wheels 0.79
be provided with mudguards 0.77
have spaced tires 0.77
have tires 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, have fenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tractor, have rear wheels)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, have fenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(tractor, have big rear wheels)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, have fenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tractor, have large rear wheels)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, have fenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(tractor, have tires)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(motorcycle, have fenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(tractor, have rear wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(tractor, have rear wheels)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(motorcycle, have fenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(tractor, have tires) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(tractor, have tires)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(motorcycle, have fenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(tractor, have big rear wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tractor, have big rear wheels)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(motorcycle, have fenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tractor, have large rear wheels) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(tractor, have large rear wheels)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(motorcycle, have fenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(motorcycle, have fenders)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(motorcycle, have fenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(motorcycle, have fenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, have fenders)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(motorcycle, have fenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(motorcycle, have fenders)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, have fenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(tractor, have rear wheels)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, have fenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(tractor, have big rear wheels)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, have fenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(tractor, have large rear wheels)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, have fenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tractor, have tires)