motorcycle: have have

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor vehicle
Weight: 0.73
, vehicle
Weight: 0.66
, vehicular accident
Weight: 0.62
, ride
Weight: 0.62
, motor
Weight: 0.60
Siblings honda
Weight: 0.69
, hot rod
Weight: 0.57
, tractor
Weight: 0.56
, atv
Weight: 0.51
, scooter
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
have tyres 1.00
have have 1.00
need have 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(ride, need have)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(motorcycle, have have)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(motorcycle, have have)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(ride, need have)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, have have)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ride, need have)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, have have)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(tractor, have tyres)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(ride, need have)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(motorcycle, have have)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(motorcycle, have have)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(motorcycle, have have)
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(tractor, have tyres)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(tractor, have tyres)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(motorcycle, have have)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(motorcycle, have have)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(motorcycle, have have)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(motorcycle, have have)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, have have)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(motorcycle, have have)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(motorcycle, have have)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, have have)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ride, need have)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(motorcycle, have have)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(tractor, have tyres)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(motorcycle, have have)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ride, need have)