mountain dew: be better than pepsi

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents soft drink
Weight: 0.69
, drink
Weight: 0.66
, carbonated beverage
Weight: 0.64
, brand
Weight: 0.61
, soda
Weight: 0.59
Siblings drinking water
Weight: 0.34
, coca cola
Weight: 0.33
, bottled water
Weight: 0.33
, alpine
Weight: 0.33
, drinking beer
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than pepsi 1.00
is best soda ever 0.77
is soda ever 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mountain dew, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(coca cola, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(coca cola, be better than pepsi)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mountain dew, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(mountain dew, be better than pepsi)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(mountain dew, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, is best soda ever)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mountain dew, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(mountain dew, is best soda ever)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(mountain dew, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(mountain dew, is best soda ever)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mountain dew, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(mountain dew, is soda ever)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(mountain dew, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, is soda ever)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(mountain dew, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(mountain dew, is soda ever)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mountain dew, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mountain dew, is best soda ever)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(mountain dew, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mountain dew, is soda ever)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(mountain dew, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mountain dew, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be better than pepsi)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(mountain dew, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(mountain dew, be better than pepsi)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(mountain dew, be better than pepsi) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(coca cola, be better than pepsi)