mountain goat: has physical part hooves

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.75
, wild animal
Weight: 0.74
, mountain
Weight: 0.69
, mammal
Weight: 0.68
, wildlife
Weight: 0.66
Siblings goat
Weight: 0.39
, llama
Weight: 0.39
, cape buffalo
Weight: 0.37
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part hooves 1.00
have strong hooves 0.93
has physical part horns 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(goat, has physical part horns)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)
Evidence: 0.11
Remarkable(goat, has physical part horns)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(goat, has physical part horns)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(mountain goat, have strong hooves)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(mountain goat, have strong hooves)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(mountain goat, has physical part horns)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(mountain goat, has physical part horns)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(mountain goat, has physical part horns)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(mountain goat, have strong hooves)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mountain goat, has physical part horns)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mountain goat, have strong hooves)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(mountain goat, has physical part hooves)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(goat, has physical part horns)