mountain range: have tops

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents valley
Weight: 0.69
, obstacle
Weight: 0.64
, barrier
Weight: 0.62
, feature
Weight: 0.60
, location
Weight: 0.59
Siblings mountain
Weight: 0.37
, rift valley
Weight: 0.34
, hill
Weight: 0.33
, mountain pass
Weight: 0.33
, waterfall
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have tops 1.00
have pointy tops 0.88
be flat on top 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mountain range, have tops)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(mountain, be flat on top)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mountain range, have tops)
Evidence: 0.02
Remarkable(mountain, be flat on top)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(mountain, be flat on top)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mountain range, have tops)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(mountain range, have tops)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(mountain range, have tops)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mountain range, have pointy tops)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(mountain range, have tops)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(mountain range, have pointy tops)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mountain range, have tops)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mountain range, have pointy tops)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(mountain range, have tops)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(mountain range, have pointy tops)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(mountain range, have tops)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mountain range, have tops)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mountain range, have tops)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mountain range, have tops)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mountain range, have tops)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mountain range, have tops)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(mountain, be flat on top)