mouse: be at computer store

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents rodent
Weight: 0.63
, organism
Weight: 0.61
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, antibody
Weight: 0.60
Siblings computer mouse
Weight: 0.68
, kangaroo rat
Weight: 0.35
, cat
Weight: 0.35
, rat
Weight: 0.34
, lizard
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at computer store 1.00
be at computer shop 0.94
be at computer 0.91
be a part of computer 0.87
be at store 0.87
be at computer lab 0.86
be related to computer 0.81
be at department store 0.80
be used to control computer 0.80
be at grocery store 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(mouse, be at computer store)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(mouse, be at computer)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at computer)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(mouse, be a part of computer)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mouse, be at department store)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be a part of computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(mouse, be related to computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be related to computer)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(mouse, be at computer lab)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(mouse, be at computer)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at department store)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at computer lab)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(mouse, be a part of computer)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(mouse, be at computer lab)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(mouse, be at department store)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(mouse, be related to computer)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(mouse, be at computer lab)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mouse, be at department store)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(mouse, be related to computer)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(mouse, be a part of computer)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(mouse, be at computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mouse, be at computer store)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(mouse, be at computer store)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(mouse, be at computer store)